Frequently Asked Questions

No. Journal decisions are controlled by editors and peer reviewers. We improve preparation, clarity, reporting, and responsiveness but never guarantee acceptance.

No. We provide ethical editing, feedback, and consultation within institutional rules. We do not complete assessed work on a student’s behalf.

No. Our website lists the methods currently supported. Each project is reviewed before acceptance, and advanced methods are referred or declined when appropriate.

Confidentiality and permitted file access are defined in the service agreement. Clients should remove unnecessary identifiers and avoid sending sensitive data before secure arrangements are confirmed.

Yes. We can organize and edit a point-by-point response and review corresponding manuscript revisions. Authors must approve all scientific responses.

We can provide a journal-fit review and a reasoned shortlist. The author makes the final decision and should independently verify journal legitimacy, scope, fees, and policies.

Potentially, but the scope depends on the question, databases, team roles, methods, and timeline. Advanced search design or meta-analysis may require an additional specialist.

Any use of AI-assisted tools should be controlled, privacy-conscious, checked by a qualified person, and disclosed when required by the client’s institution, journal, or funder. Confidential files should not be entered into unapproved public AI systems.

Projects are quoted after reviewing scope, word count, complexity, files, deadline, and expertise required. The website should not advertise a single price for all projects.

Authorship is not sold. Authorship or acknowledgement should reflect the actual contribution and the policies of the journal or institution.